For example, say your team is thinking about using cotton for a new shirt. Making will tell you that this will be a better choice from a chemistry standpoint nike air
max 90 than nylon 6 and that it’s more desirable from a waste standpoint than hemp, but that either linen or lyocell would make more sense when it comes to water conservation. In fact, cotton is a dismal 17 out of 22 when it comes to water, but it ranks third for waste management or nike air max recycling potential.
On Nike's MSI, cotton earns a total score of 25.8 out of 50 (the higher the score, the less of an impact the material has on the environment, so cotton doesn't perform all that well against the ideal scenario laid out in air max uk the ratings). Down, on the other hand, gets a 37.5 score on the index, which was the highest one I could find.
